Chapter 6 a of the Act on Information Management in Public Administration (906/2019, Public Information Management Act) entered into force as of 1 May 2023. The provision on entry into force of the act on the amendment of the Act on Information Management in Public Administration (488/2023) includes an 18-month transition period that applies to such automated decision-making processes that were in use upon the law’s entry into force. In accordance with the provision on entry into force, a decision equivalent to the adoption decision specified in the Public Information Management Act’s section 28 d must be made on the automated decision-making procedures in force before the act entered into force.
This decision equivalent to the adoption decision applies to Varma’s automated decision-making procedure for reviewing YEL income under the Self-Employed Persons’ Pensions Act (1272/2006, YEL), which was in use as part of the whole automated decision-making procedure when the Public Information Management Act entered into force on 1 May 2023.
Varma continues the automated decision-making procedure regarding the reviewing of YEL income, which was adopted before 1 May 2023.
This decision confirms that the automated decision-making procedure for reviewing YEL income adopted by Varma before 1 May 2023 complies with the Administrative Procedure Act (434/2003) and the Public Information Management Act.
Conditions for automated decision-making
Chapter 8 b of the Administrative Procedure Act stipulates the conditions that must be met, in addition to what is stipulated elsewhere in the act, in order for an authority to be able to make a decision that ends the processing of the matter using automated decision-making without the decision being verified and approved by a natural person.
The authority must assess beforehand which matters are of a nature that they can be decided using automation. The regulations on automated decision-making also apply to Varma when it carries out its task as an implementer of statutory earnings-related pension cover.
In accordance with section 53 e, subsection 2 of the Administrative Procedure Act, a matter can be decided by means of automation if it does not include factors that would require case-specific consideration based on the prior assessment of the party making the decision, or if the processor of the matter has, on a case-specific basis, considered the factors required for automated decision-making.
Furthermore, according to section 53 f of the Administrative Procedure Act, a condition for automated decision-making is that a natural person whom the decision applies to can, in all respects, require that it be corrected free of charge as stipulated in the Administrative Procedure Act, chapter 7 a, or with an equivalent demand, which is processed by the authority having made the decision or by an authority that belongs to the same controller.
The automated decision-making procedure for YEL insurance at Varma is structured in such a way that processing that requires the consideration of an expert (section 53e (2) of the Administrative Procedure Act) or situations that otherwise require reviewing by a processor are directed to a natural person for processing. This has been achieved using the so-called exclusion technique so that only decision-making situations that have not been separately excluded enter the automated process. All such work stages that require consideration by a processor have been excluded from automated processing.
Automated decision-making procedure for reviewing YEL income
The YEL income review refers to the process where the entrepreneur’s previously confirmed YEL income is reviewed on Varma’s initiative every three years, and a new YEL income is confirmed for the entrepreneur in accordance with section 112a of YEL. The automated resolution of the matter is based on the applicable act and processing rules prepared on the basis of prior consideration.
According to section 112, paragraph 1 of YEL, the self-employed person’s YEL income is the wages or salary that would reasonably be paid if a person with similar skills and knowledge was hired to perform their entrepreneurial activities, or compensation that can otherwise be considered to correspond on average to such work. According to the section’s paragraph 2, the income is confirmed based on an overall assessment. When confirming the amount of YEL income, the aforementioned wages or salary and compensation are considered to be the median pay of private-sector, full-time workers in the sector, in addition to which, other information describing the amount of the self-employed person’s work input, the scope of their entrepreneurial activities, their skills and knowledge, and the value of their work input is taken into account.
According to section 112a, paragraph 2 of YEL, the pension institution reviews the previously confirmed YEL income for an entrepreneur every three years by providing the entrepreneur with a written proposal for a new YEL income based on the information available to the pension institution as referred to in paragraph 2 of section 112. Thus, the same principles for determining the YEL income are applied in the process of reviewing YEL income as when confirming the entrepreneur’s YEL income in connection with processing an insurance application or a request for a change in YEL income submitted by the entrepreneur.
In the process of reviewing the YEL income, the Finnish Centre for Pensions’ calculation service for calculating the recommended YEL income is used as a tool for determining the YEL income. The calculation service provides the entrepreneur with a YEL income recommendation based on the median salary in the sector, with a +/-30% leeway in each direction. The calculation of the recommended YEL income and the data used in the calculation are described in detail in the Finnish Centre for Pensions’ application instructions YEL-työtulosuosituksen taustalaskentapalvelun laskentakaava (the calculation formula for the YEL income recommendation background calculation service).
According to section 112 of YEL concerning the confirmation of YEL income, the confirmation of YEL income requires an overall assessment. As the Finnish Centre for Pensions’ YEL income recommendation calculation service is used as a tool when determining the YEL income, the entrepreneur’s YEL income is, however, practically always resolved in the same way based on the underlying data from the calculator if the entrepreneur does not present, in the matter, any other additional data impacting their YEL income. With the help of the YEL income recommendation calculation service, the YEL income for entrepreneurs engaged in a certain size of entrepreneurial activity in a specific sector is defined based on the same principles in all pension institutions. The leeway offered by the YEL income recommendation aims to take into account, in addition to the median salary of the entrepreneur’s sector and the scope of the entrepreneurial activities, other information specified in law that describes the amount of the entrepreneur’s work input, their skills and knowledge, and the value of their work input.
The entrepreneur’s YEL income is reviewed in an automated decision-making procedure after the entrepreneur has been consulted, if the entrepreneur does not provide clarification on factors affecting the YEL income during the consultation and has accepted the proposed YEL income; or if the entrepreneur has stated during the consultation that they will increase their YEL income to the level recommended by the Finnish Centre for Pensions’ YEL income recommendation calculation service or within its leeway; or if the entrepreneur does not respond to the consultation regarding the review of the YEL income. In the situations described above, Varma has assessed that there are no factors requiring case-specific consideration in confirming the YEL income, and the matter can be resolved through an automated decision-making procedure, unless it is directed to be processed by a natural person based on other factors.
The entrepreneur can, in all respects, demand a rectification of the decision they received free of charge through an appeal as specified in chapter 7 a of the Administrative Procedure Act. A decision concerning the reviewing of YEL income under the YEL insurance can be appealed in accordance with YEL, chapter 10.
- Processing rules for the automated decision-making procedure regarding the review of YEL income at Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company
- Tasks and decision-making
- Quality management, quality assurance, and handling of error situations
- Data protection and information security descriptions
- Description of the YEL income recommendation calculation service (Finnish Centre for Pensions)
- Administrative Procedure Act (434/2003)
- Act on Information Management in Public Administration (906/2019)
- Act on an amendment to the Act on Information Management in Public Administration (488/2023)
- Self-Employed Persons’ Pensions Act (1272/2006)
- Act to amend the Self-employed Persons’ Pensions Act (1157/2022)
The decision-making procedure has been implemented before the entry into force of chapter 6 a of the Public Information Management Act on 1 May 2023.
This decision (that is equivalent to the adoption decision) on the automated decision-making procedure currently in use, which was adopted before 1 May 2023, was made on 26 September 2024.
This decision (that is equivalent to the adoption decision) on the automated decision-making procedure currently in use was made by Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company’s insurance services’ management team. The Senior Vice-President responsible for insurance services is Pasi Mustonen.
For more information on Varma's automated decision-making procedure for YEL insurance decisions, please contact Insurance Services Director Riikka Nivus, tel. +358 10 192 100 (switchboard) or firstname.lastname(at)varma.fi.
Decisions and releases concerning Varma’s automated decision-making procedures are publicly available on Varma’s website at varma.fi.